Last updated: May 2026
TL;DR — U.S. Float Therapy Market Report 2026
- 1,526 U.S. float therapy centers indexed across 44 states plus DC, with California (110), Florida (45), New York (39), Colorado (31), and Illinois (26) leading.
- Of the 171 centers that disclose tank format, 39 list traditional open float tanks, 37 list enclosed pods, and 16 list both — pods are running roughly even with classic tanks at the studio level.
- Floatation-REST has Cohen's d > 2 effect sizes on state anxiety in single-session PLOS ONE trials (Feinstein et al., 2018) and significant reductions in chronic pain intensity in a JAMA Network Open RCT (Loose et al., 2021).
- Data source: floatdirectory.com proprietary float center directory, refreshed monthly.
A brief history of floatation therapy in the U.S.
The category is older than most consumers realize. American neuroscientist John C. Lilly built the first sensory isolation tank at the National Institute of Mental Health in 1954 to test whether the brain would continue functioning when sensory input was removed. Early designs required breathing masks; the Epsom-salt-saturated lie-on-your-back version arrived in the 1970s once Lilly refined the design with heated water at skin temperature.
The commercial industry traces to 1972, when Glenn Perry, working alongside Lilly, designed the first commercially available float tank. Perry and Lee Liebner founded Samadhi Tank Co. and opened the first commercial float center in Beverly Hills in 1979. The Samadhi open-tank design — a wood-and-fiberglass rectangular tank — is still in production and still sells, more than 50 years after the original.
The category has been through three waves. The first late-1970s wave faded in the 1980s amid AIDS-era concerns about shared-water hygiene that were largely overblown for the high-salt environment but commercially devastating. The second wave from 2010 to 2018 was driven by Joe Rogan's podcast coverage, the Dreampod and i-sopod commercial pod designs, and franchise expansion of operators like True REST. The third post-2023 wave is research-led, anchored by the Laureate Institute for Brain Research and the Float Research Collective.
State of the U.S. float therapy market in 2026
The U.S. float therapy market in 2026 spans 1,526 commercial float centers indexed across 44 states plus DC, with enclosed pods and traditional open float tanks running nearly even among studios that disclose tank format. The category sits inside a global float tank market that Business Research Insights values at roughly $640 million in 2026, with North America holding the largest regional share thanks to a mature wellness sector and the highest concentration of commercial centers on the planet.
Growth is uneven. The first U.S. boom ran from 2010 to 2018 as float studios rode the broader wellness wave, then the pandemic shuttered hundreds of centers between 2020 and 2022. The post-2023 rebound has been quieter — single-location operators replacing closed franchises rather than rapid net expansion — which is why our 1,526-count sits below the peak estimates Float Tank Solutions reported in its pre-pandemic State of the Industry surveys.
The clinical evidence base is what's actually moving the category in 2026. Three peer-reviewed trials from the Laureate Institute for Brain Research — including the 2018 PLOS ONE anxiolytic study, a 2023 safety and feasibility RCT in anxious and depressed patients, and a 2023 anorexia nervosa trial in eClinicalMedicine — have pulled float therapy out of the alternative-wellness ghetto and into mainstream behavioral-health conversations.
Our directory shows the top 5 states — California (110), Florida (45), New York (39), Colorado (31), and Illinois (26) — collectively house 251 centers, about 17% of the U.S. total and roughly 42% of the centers with a confirmed state assignment. Colorado punches above its weight here: the state ranks 21st by population but 4th by float center count, anchored by Denver and Boulder.
Three forces are reshaping U.S. float demand in 2026. First, the research-evidence flywheel is shifting positioning from "wellness curiosity" to "anxiety adjunct," especially in metros with strong therapist referral networks. Second, the home-tank category is pulling solo regulars out of monthly memberships and into one-time $1,800-$30K purchases. Third, the Float Research Collective's Project Arcturus — a 100-center international study — is positioning float therapy for eventual insurance coverage, which would reset the unit economics entirely.
The regulatory backdrop is also tightening. The Floatation Tank Association released the 2025 North American Float Tank Standards in July 2025, adding microbiological testing guidance, UV and ozone sanitization rules, and revised emergency protocols on top of the original 2017 NAFTS document. Several state health departments are mapping float tanks onto NSF/ANSI/CAN 50 pool-and-spa code, with Texas and California furthest along in formal inspection regimes.
Tank type distribution: pods vs open tanks vs cabins (proprietary data)
Of the 171 U.S. float centers in our directory that publish tank format, 39 centers operate traditional open float tanks only, 37 operate enclosed pods only, and 16 operate both. The remaining 79 disclosing centers run cabin (stand-up) units, open pools, or multi-format setups combining three or four configurations. This is the first published cross-sectional split of U.S. float centers by tank format.
The distinction matters for the consumer. An enclosed pod (the Dreampod V2, the i-sopod, the Float Pod) is the iconic "egg" shape — typically 8 feet long, with a hatch the user closes. A traditional open float tank is rectangular, often built into the room, and the user enters by stepping over a low wall and lying down without an overhead enclosure. Cabin (stand-up) units allow the user to enter standing and dim ambient lights instead of fully sealing in. Open pools are large communal-format float rooms — used by a handful of studios for couples floats or for clients with severe claustrophobia.
The pod-vs-tank split affects who books. Enclosed pods give first-timers a more controlled sensory deprivation experience but trigger more claustrophobia opt-outs. Open tanks and cabins skew toward repeat floaters, fibromyalgia patients who need to enter and exit gear-free, and clients with PTSD who specifically need an unsealed exit path. The Float Tank Association notes that 30-40% of first-time floaters report some claustrophobia anxiety — the cabin/open-pool subsegment exists to serve them.
| Tank format | Typical footprint | User entry | Best for | Used by (our database) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enclosed pod | 8' x 5' x 4.5' tall | Lie down, close hatch overhead | First-timers, sensory-deprivation purists | 37 centers (pod only) + 33 mixed |
| Open float tank | 8' x 5' built-in | Step over low wall, lie down | Claustrophobia-prone, repeat floaters | 39 centers (tank only) + 49 mixed |
| Cabin (stand-up) | 7' x 5' x 7' tall | Walk in standing, then lie down | Wheelchair-accessible, PTSD-safe entry | 7 centers (cabin only) + 24 mixed |
| Open room/pool | 10'+ across, communal-scale | Walk in, no enclosure | Couples floats, severe claustrophobia | 13 centers (pool only) + 38 mixed |
Coverage gap to disclose: 1,355 centers in our directory (89%) do not publish tank format on their website or in their booking flow. The pod-vs-tank split above is drawn from the 171-center subset that does disclose, and the true industry-wide ratio may differ. We refresh this attribute monthly via re-scrape of operator websites.
The commercial brands behind the disclosed-tank subset are concentrated. The Dreampod V2 and Vmax dominate the U.S. pod market, the i-sopod anchors the premium tier at roughly $32,000 per unit, and Samadhi Tank Co. — the original 1972 design — still ships open-tank kits in the $10,000 range. The Float Lab single-room build-in commands the $40 LA price point. Pricing and feature comparison sits in our i-sopod vs Dreampod vs Samadhi guide.
State-by-state distribution
Geographic clustering is real. California alone houses 110 centers — 7.2% of the national total and more than double the next state, Florida at 45. The top 10 states (CA, FL, NY, CO, IL, PA, NJ, MI, OH, IN) account for 358 centers, roughly 60% of all centers with a confirmed state assignment.
| Rank | State | Centers | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | California | 110 | Los Angeles 12, San Francisco 8; dense from LA to SF Bay |
| 2 | Florida | 45 | Tampa 8 is the single largest metro cluster outside CA |
| 3 | New York | 39 | NYC 9 + Long Island and upstate spread |
| 4 | Colorado | 31 | Denver 7; punches above population weight |
| 5 | Illinois | 26 | Chicago 7 anchors |
| 6 | Pennsylvania | 26 | Philadelphia 9 + Pittsburgh corridor |
| 7 | New Jersey | 21 | NYC-metro overflow |
| 8 | Michigan | 21 | Detroit, Grand Rapids hubs |
| 9 | Ohio | 20 | Columbus, Cleveland, Cincinnati spread |
| 10 | Indiana | 19 | Indianapolis 11 anchors the count |
Three patterns stand out. First, the West Coast is overweight: California, Colorado, Oregon, Washington, and Nevada together account for 168 centers, about 11% of the U.S. directory and 28% of the centers with confirmed state data. Second, the Rust Belt is surprisingly dense — Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Pennsylvania, and Illinois collectively hold 112 centers, suggesting float therapy has found a real foothold in mid-cost mid-sized cities where rent supports a $79-99 session. Third, the South lags. Texas shows only 5 centers in our directory — almost certainly an under-count given the state's population, and a known coverage gap we are actively backfilling.
The biggest data gap is the 925 records (61%) missing state assignment. These are centers we indexed from broader directory sources where state extraction failed or returned ambiguous matches. We are refreshing geocoding monthly and expect the unknown-state count to drop below 30% by end of 2026. Until then, every state-level statistic in this report carries that caveat.
City-level concentration follows state count with one notable exception: Indianapolis (11 centers) ranks ahead of Los Angeles (12) on a per-capita basis. Per-capita leadership belongs to smaller cities — Bridgeport CT (7), Kansas City KS (5), and the Tampa/St. Pete corridor — where a single regional operator or franchise has driven the count.
Pricing landscape: $45–$110 per session, $59–$99 memberships
Float session pricing in the U.S. clusters tighter than most wellness categories. Of the 661 centers in our directory with disclosed pricing, 658 (99.5%) operate in the $$ tier — roughly $60-$110 per single session — and only 3 advertise $$$ premium pricing. The 865 centers without disclosed price likely sit in the same band; the $$ tier is the de facto industry standard.
Drilling into per-session numbers, the national typical range runs $60-$90 for a 60-minute session, with major metros pushing to $99-$110 and rural markets dropping to $45-$65. Urban Float charges $99 per drop-in. Float Lab in Los Angeles holds the $40 floor with its single-room build-in. Most studios run a 60-minute base session with 90-minute upgrades at +$20-$30. The full session-cost breakdown lives in our float therapy cost 2026 pricing guide.
Memberships are how most centers survive financially. The typical structure runs $59-$89 per month for one float, with each additional float in-month priced at $39-$59. True REST Float Spa, the largest U.S. franchise by location count, sits at roughly $79/month — full breakdown in our True REST membership review. For weekly floaters the math works at one membership float plus three discounted floats per month, typically $200-$280 all-in versus $300+ at drop-in rates.
The single biggest unit-economics question for operators is salt cost. A standard pod or tank holds 850-1,100 pounds of pharmaceutical-grade Epsom salt (magnesium sulfate heptahydrate). Initial fill runs $2,500-$4,500, and salt top-ups run $200-$500 per month per tank. Add utility costs at $300-$600 per tank per month — heated 93-94°F water, filtration cycles between every session, dehumidification of the float room — and the per-session cost-of-goods sits around $8-$15 before labor. Our float tank utility costs guide breaks down the line items.
The pricing-to-research gap matters. Despite the strongest evidence base in alternative wellness — d > 2 effect sizes on state anxiety in single sessions — float therapy is still cash-pay in nearly all U.S. markets. No CPT code, no insurance reimbursement, no FSA/HSA eligibility unless paired with a physician's letter of medical necessity for chronic pain. The Float Research Collective's Project Arcturus is the industry's bet on closing that gap by 2027-2028.
Research evidence base: anxiety, sleep, pain
The float therapy research base in 2026 is the strongest it has ever been, and almost all of the high-quality evidence has emerged in the last seven years. The Laureate Institute for Brain Research in Tulsa, OK — led by Justin Feinstein and Sahib Khalsa — is the single most prolific source.
The anchor anxiety study is the Feinstein et al. 2018 PLOS ONE paper, which examined 50 anxious participants across single 60-minute floatation-REST sessions. State anxiety dropped with an estimated Cohen's d > 2 — a "large" effect by conventional benchmarks is d > 0.8, so this is a very strong signal. Participants also reported significant reductions in stress, muscle tension, depression, and negative affect, with the largest effects in the most severely anxious. The full breakdown sits in our float tank centers benefits research summary.
The follow-up Feinstein et al. 2024 PLOS ONE randomized controlled safety and feasibility trial extended this to a multi-session protocol in anxious and depressed individuals. The study demonstrated tolerability across eight sessions and showed sustained anxiolytic effects, addressing one of the primary objections to the 2018 single-session design — that effects might wash out with repeated exposure.
Chronic pain has its own RCT anchor: the Loose et al. 2021 JAMA Network Open trial randomized 99 chronic pain patients across floatation-REST, sham, and wait-list arms. Five-session floatation-REST produced significant short-term decreases in pain intensity, pain area, pain widespreadness, and anxiety — though no significant long-term benefit at follow-up. This is the cleanest published causal evidence for float therapy in any indication.
The anorexia application is newer and may be the most clinically consequential. The Choquette/Feinstein 2023 eClinicalMedicine trial randomized inpatients with anorexia nervosa 2:1 to eight twice-weekly 60-minute floatation-REST sessions plus care-as-usual versus care-as-usual alone. The floatation arm showed acute reductions in body dissatisfaction and anxiety that persisted at six-month follow-up. For a condition with notoriously poor treatment response, six-month durability is meaningful.
Sleep evidence is the weakest of the four pillars. A 2022 single-arm study of floatation-REST for insomnia symptoms showed improvement in sleep latency and efficiency in some participants, but the systematic review summary concludes effects are inconsistent and that controlled trials in clinically diagnosed insomnia populations are still needed.
Cortisol and blood pressure: the Schulz & Kaspar 1994 dry vs wet flotation studies found that eight repeated REST sessions produced significant decreases in plasma cortisol and mean arterial pressure, with no difference between wet (flotation) and dry (chamber) REST. Our float tank cortisol studies guide breaks down the 21% reduction figure that gets cited frequently in float marketing — the underlying data is real but the meta-analysis context matters.
A 2025 BMC Complementary Medicine systematic review pooled the available floatation-REST trials and found consistent short-term effects on stress, anxiety, and pain across studies, with the field's main weaknesses still small sample sizes (n=50-100 typical) and short follow-up windows. The 1990 Suedfeld meta-analysis — covering 27 studies and 449 participants — found a pooled effect size of 1.02 on stress-management outcomes, which remains the most-cited aggregate number.
The transdermal magnesium absorption question deserves a separate flag. Float marketing frequently claims magnesium uptake from the Epsom salt solution. The actual peer-reviewed evidence is limited to a 2017 Cardiff University pilot study showing modest blood-level increases after extended high-concentration exposure — far from the dramatic claims sometimes made. Our magnesium absorption guide walks through the actual numbers.
PTSD evidence is still emerging. The Laureate Institute has published preliminary work on float therapy for combat-related PTSD in veterans, with the protocol design borrowing from the anxiety and anorexia trials. Effect sizes are smaller than in the pure anxiety populations, and sample sizes remain small, but the safety profile and tolerability in trauma-exposed populations have been consistent. The WorkSafeBC 2024 evidence review on restricted environmental stimulus therapy for PTSD is the most recent formal evaluation by an occupational-health body and concludes the evidence is promising but premature for blanket endorsement.
What the research base does not yet support: claims around addiction recovery, ADHD treatment, autism intervention, or general "cellular detox." Float therapy has a real, replicable acute anxiolytic effect, real short-term chronic pain reduction, and a credible six-month signal in anorexia body image. Everything else in the marketing copy is either pre-clinical, anecdotal, or borrowed from adjacent wellness categories.
Commercial brand landscape
The U.S. commercial float tank market is dominated by three manufacturers. Dreampod (Dream Water Ltd.) holds the largest installed base, with the Dreampod V2 as the flagship and the Vmax as the larger high-end model. The i-sopod, built in the UK and imported, anchors the premium commercial tier at roughly $32,000 — operators report 14+ year service lives on i-sopod units. The Samadhi Tank Co. open-tank kit, continuous since the 1972 Glenn Perry / John Lilly original design, still ships in the $10,000 range and remains the bestseller in the open-tank category. Brand-by-brand comparison lives in our pod cost comparison guide.
Float Lab — the Los Angeles operator behind the $40 single-session price point — designs and builds its own integrated room systems rather than purchasing pre-fab pods. Quest, ProFloat, and Apollo Float Tank round out the secondary brand tier with mostly regional U.S. installations. The home market is increasingly served by Dreampod's Home Float Plus line and a growing DIY/Royspa segment.
The pod tier is consolidating. The Dreampod V2 sits at roughly $20,000-$25,000 for new commercial units; the V-Max larger format and the Sport Float Pod entry-level commercial unit each anchor adjacent price points. The i-sopod's $32,000 premium reflects fiberglass build quality that operators report holds up after 14+ years of continuous commercial use. Most multi-location U.S. franchises — True REST being the largest — standardize on Dreampod for unit economics. Boutique single-location operators are more likely to choose i-sopod or build out a Float Lab-style integrated room.
The DIY home tank market is a meaningful sub-segment. Home tank costs run roughly $1,800-$30,000 depending on whether the buyer is going DIY plywood-and-pond-liner construction or commercial-grade pod hardware. Our home float tank cost guide breaks down the line items including salt, heater, filtration, and dehumidification — the real total budget is closer to $4,000-$5,000 minimum for a workable home setup once consumables are included.
Two structural questions are reshaping the brand landscape in 2026. First, will the home-tank segment cannibalize commercial memberships? Existing data suggests yes — solo regulars who float 2-4x per month math out a Dreampod Home Float at roughly 18 months payback versus commercial drop-ins. Second, can U.S. franchises rebuild post-pandemic? True REST has slowed expansion since 2022, and the next franchise wave looks more likely to come from athletic-recovery-focused operators (sometimes pairing float with cold plunge and infrared sauna) than from pure-float chains.
How to verify a float center before booking
The wellness industry is full of operators who cut corners on sanitation, and float tanks are no exception — the combination of warm water, high salt, and shared use makes sanitation the single most important quality signal. Five things to check before you book.
-
Filtration cycle disclosure. Per the NAFTS sanitation guidance, float tanks should run a minimum of three filtration turnovers between users — that filters about 95% of the solution. Four turnovers reaches 98%. Operators that won't quote turnover counts are usually doing fewer.
-
Sanitization stack. Look for either UV plus hydrogen peroxide, ozone plus hydrogen peroxide, or chlorine-based dosing in addition to filtration. Salt alone does not reliably kill all pathogens at the time-windows float operations use, per the 2025 FTA standards update.
-
Pre-float shower requirement. A mandatory pre-float shower with soap is the single largest contaminant reduction step. If the center treats the shower as optional, walk.
-
Health department posting. Several states — Texas, California, Florida, Michigan — now classify float tanks under pool-and-spa code and require posted inspection reports. Ask to see the most recent one.
-
Specific gravity and pH testing cadence. Operators should test at least daily and ideally between sessions. Specific gravity should hold at 1.25-1.28 (salt saturation); pH should sit at 7.2-7.6.
Our float tank hygiene safety guide walks through the full red-flag checklist.
Frequently asked questions
How many float tank centers are there in the U.S.? Our directory indexes 1,526 commercial float centers as of May 2026, across 44 states plus DC. This is below pre-pandemic peak estimates from Float Tank Solutions' industry surveys, reflecting the 2020-2022 closures and a slower-than-expected recovery.
Is float therapy proven to work for anxiety? The strongest evidence is from the Laureate Institute for Brain Research. The Feinstein 2018 PLOS ONE study found state anxiety reductions with a Cohen's d > 2 — a very large effect size — across 50 anxious participants in single sessions. The 2024 randomized controlled follow-up confirmed tolerability across multiple sessions. The evidence is strongest for state anxiety; trait anxiety and clinical anxiety disorders need more work.
Does float therapy help chronic pain? The Loose et al. 2021 JAMA Network Open RCT is the best causal evidence — 99 chronic pain patients across three arms showed significant short-term decreases in pain intensity, pain area, and widespreadness after five floatation-REST sessions. Long-term effects at follow-up were not significant. Float is best positioned as an adjunct, not a standalone treatment.
How much does a float session cost? National typical range is $60-$90 for 60 minutes, with major metros at $99-$110 and budget options like Float Lab LA at $40. Memberships drop the per-session cost to $59-$79 for monthly committed floaters. Our float therapy cost 2026 guide has the full breakdown.
What's the difference between a pod and a float tank? An enclosed pod (Dreampod, i-sopod) is the iconic egg-shape with an overhead hatch the user closes. A traditional open float tank is rectangular and built into the room — the user lies down without an overhead enclosure. Pods are more sensory-isolated; open tanks are friendlier for claustrophobia-prone first-timers.
Are float tanks sanitary? When operated to NAFTS standards — three+ filtration turnovers between users, UV/ozone/peroxide sanitization, mandatory pre-float showers — yes. The high salt concentration (1.25-1.28 specific gravity) is itself bacteriostatic for most common pathogens. Cut-corner operators are a real concern, hence the pre-booking checklist above.
How does float therapy affect cortisol? Schulz & Kaspar's research found that eight repeated REST sessions reduced plasma cortisol and mean arterial pressure significantly, with no difference between dry chamber REST and wet flotation REST. The 1990 Suedfeld meta-analysis reported a pooled effect size of 1.02 across 27 stress-management studies.
Does Epsom salt absorption actually do anything during a float? The peer-reviewed evidence for transdermal magnesium absorption is limited — a 2017 Cardiff pilot showed modest blood-level increases, but far short of the dramatic claims in some float marketing. Most of float therapy's documented effects are from sensory restriction itself, not from magnesium uptake.
Will insurance cover float therapy? Currently almost never in the U.S. There's no CPT code and no Medicare coverage. The Float Research Collective's Project Arcturus — a 100+ center international study — is the industry's coordinated effort to build the evidence base needed for eventual insurance recognition. FSA/HSA use is occasionally possible with a physician letter of medical necessity for chronic pain.
How often should you float? The research dosing protocols cluster around 1-2 sessions per week for an initial 4-6 week block, then maintenance at 1-2 per month. The Loose 2021 chronic pain RCT used five sessions over a short window; the Choquette/Feinstein anorexia trial used eight twice-weekly. For general stress and anxiety, monthly floats appear to maintain the bulk of the effect once an initial loading block is complete.
What are the contraindications? Open wounds, fresh tattoos, ear infections, active skin infections, severe claustrophobia, pregnancy in the first trimester, and uncontrolled epilepsy are the standard absolute or relative contraindications. The high salt concentration is intensely painful on broken skin. Most centers screen for these on the intake form.
Methodology
This report combines proprietary directory data from floatdirectory.com with peer-reviewed published research. Center counts and attribute breakdowns are drawn from our directory snapshot as of May 2026.
Data sources. Our directory is built from a combination of public business listings (Outscraper queries against Google Maps, Yelp, and Bing Places), operator-website scrapes of publicly disclosed tank format and pricing, and manual verification of flagged entries. Tank format is classified by parsing operator-website language plus booking-flow screenshots — categories are "enclosed pod," "float tank" (traditional open tank), "cabin (stand-up)," and "open room/pool."
Coverage and limitations. 925 records (61%) are missing state assignment as of May 2026, due to ambiguous or failed geocoding from broader directory sources. 1,355 records (89%) do not publish tank format on the operator website, meaning the pod-vs-tank distribution in this report is drawn from the 171-center disclosing subset. The 1,526 total is a working count — we expect it to rise as we backfill known coverage gaps in Texas, Georgia, and several Southern states currently under-represented in our index. Pricing data is taken from operator websites and booking flows; centers that gate pricing behind login or phone-quote are coded "unknown."
Refresh cadence. The directory re-scrapes monthly. Material updates — new openings, closures, manufacturer-brand changes — propagate to this report at the next monthly refresh. The "Last updated" line above tracks the most recent data pull.
Corrections. If you operate a float center and spot inaccurate data — wrong tank format, outdated pricing, missing location — email corrections to the floatdirectory.com team and we'll verify and update within the next refresh cycle.
Future improvements. Priority backfill in 2026: (1) state assignment for the 925 unknown records, (2) tank-format extraction for the 1,355 undisclosed centers via expanded operator-website parsing, (3) brand attribution (Dreampod / i-sopod / Samadhi / Float Lab / other) for centers that publish equipment make.
Key findings at a glance
- 1,526 U.S. float therapy centers indexed across 44 states plus DC.
- Top 5 states: California (110), Florida (45), New York (39), Colorado (31), Illinois (26) — 17% of total.
- Of 171 format-disclosing centers: 39 open tanks only, 37 pods only, 16 both — pods and open tanks running roughly even.
- Pricing tightly clustered in $60-$110 per session ($$); 99.5% of disclosing centers operate in this tier.
- Strongest research evidence: state anxiety reduction (Cohen's d > 2, Feinstein 2018), chronic pain short-term reduction (Loose JAMA Network Open 2021), anorexia body image (Choquette/Feinstein 2023).
- Coverage gap to disclose: 925 records (61%) missing state assignment; 1,355 (89%) missing tank format. Refreshing monthly.